OpenID Usage Statistics from Ma.gnolia.com

Ma.gnolia.com, a popular social bookmarking site, added OpenID as an alternative method for new user registration in December, 2006. OpenID is a decentralized user-centric identity architecture that allows a user to use a URL based ID (think of it like a username) to log into a variety of websites.

Earlier this month, Larry Halff, founder of Gnolia Systems shared usage statistics of 5467 users that registered for new service between December 15 and January 31. No specific user data was provided.

Sample Sizing:

  • 4800 users enrolled with standard usernames and passwords
  • 667 users (12.2%) enrolled using an OpenID Identity URL



UsageThe graph to the left shows the percentage of low activity users. 48.9% of all new standard username/password enrollments created accounts but did not "use" the site by adding a bookmark. In comparison, only 45.5% of OpenID users failed to complete a single enrollment.

We have defined "Dormant" users as those who set up an account and bookmarked somewhere between 0 and 9 sites, effectively making them non-active users. In this case, 83.6% of standard registrations fell into this category while only 72.5% of OpenID logins were inactive.

This activity trend shows that though slightly less than 50% of all new users fail to get started using the site, OpenID users were significantly more likely (over 11.1%) to become active users. 

  

The primary purpose of ma.gnolia.com is to have users  save bookmarks which can then be seen by other users. Users join groups to share bookmarks as well.

Across all users, OpenID users have more than double the amount of bookmarks (80 vs 38). Among non-dormant users, OpenID accounts have on average 289 bookmarks while  standard accounts only have 226.

 

The third key metric that we were able to track is the overall usage of the site. In this case, we were able to track the number of times that a user added bookmarks. The more days that a user leaves bookmarks, the more active he or she is on the system. As it is shown below, OpenID users were more likely to regularly use the ma.gnolia service. 

As ma.gnolia.com doesn't track logins, it is not possible at this time to determine how often users actually log in to use their account, but tracking bookmarks does provide valuable insight into how different user groups utilize the system.

An analysis of the data shows that a significant number of users, both OpenID and standard, after the initial login load up an initial set of bookmarks that first day, but then become dormant. The dropoff for users that log in a second day and add more bookmarks is steeper for the standard accounts. However, after that, the general usage patterns seem to be similar regardless of how the user initially registered. 

It is possible that there is a correlation between OpenID users and "Web 2.0" services - that people who are adopting OpenID as their preferred method when signing up for new services are more attuned to use social networking sites such as ma.gnolia. As this is an emerging technology, we are still looking to define more data points with other service providers. However, this first data on the uptake and usage of OpenID does show that, at a minimum, the impact of implementing OpenID was positive for ma.gnolia.

This JIT Report is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 License. Please attribute the following: Avery Glasser, activeanalysis.net, Feb. 2007. 

Average rating
(0 votes)

Site Tags: Copyright 2007, Active Analysis, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Redistribution not permitted without written approval from Active Analysis, LLC.

Comments

And that's despite the awful user experience!

It's really amazing how motivated OpenID users are! I briefly mentioned ma.gnolia's OpenID UX here.

Although this site seems to be repeating ma.gnolia's worst mistakes, I'd love to download the Drupal 5.x OpenID module.

An OpenID is Not an Account

I think you don't really understand the use-patterns for OpenID. For a high level overview of the difference between having an account somewhere and using OpenID to login in, check out http://simonwillison.net/2007/Jan/10/account/.

A Username is a Username

I think you don't really understand what you're talking about. What does asking for the same data twice have to do with that?

An Account is not an Authentication

One of the general issues here is that people are not separating the difference between an account an authentication method.

For example - even though activeanalysis.net supports OpenID as an authentication method, and also supports the simple registration tags to exchange a preferred username and email address, your OpenID login is not your account. Your OpenID is simply a way to sign into your account.

If, for some reason, OpenID support disappeared tomorrow - you would still have an account here on Active Analysis. You could simply put in your registered email address (if you left a valid one) and ask for a password to be regenerated. A password would then be sent to the email address on record.

In any single sign-on schema, there are always user accounts - the single sign on system just abstracts the authentication over to a service (in this case, the OpenID provider).

You're absolutely right

My point was that ma.gnolia (or ActiveAnalysis) shouldn't ask for a username and an email after they already got those from the OpenID provider.

We don't

Actually, ActiveAnalysis doesn't. If, on registration, the server sends the username and email via SREG, then we don't ever ask for it. We just CONFIRM it.

The problem is actually that i-broker support of SREG has issues. Because of this, i-name users might have to enter their data twice. However, considering that we don't support i-Names (and yes - the way the GRS resolves i-Names into OpenID has some peculiarities), I'd say we're darned good.

I just created five new accounts using different OpenID providers. Each time, it would prompt me at the OpenID provider if I approved sending the username and email. Then, it put me to a page where I CONFIRMED the username and email - just as a courtesy since this information is so important and in case I want to change the username as some OpenID providers don't let you change it before submission.

Personally, I don't see what all the hub-bub is about.

You post one good article about openID

You post one good article about openID, I fine some very useful ideas on it, OpenID solves the identity problem, not the trust problem. When a user authenticates with OpenID, what they are doing is stating “I have the ability to prove my ownership of this URL”. it is great.

software reviews

I agree...

Great article!
Paulo da libros

re

Brilliant idea. Thanks for very interesting article. btw. I really enjoyed reading all of your articles. It’s interesting to read ideas, and observations from someone else’s point of view… makes you think more. Greetings My private website: Tomasz Gorski

Submission to the OpenID Directory

Hello, it´s good to see that you are one of the early adopters who has implemented OpenID on his site and if this comment shows up, it works great :). I would like to spread the word about this emerging technology and have submitted your site to "The OpenID Directory". I hope this is fine for you. BTW: You can let your readers vote for your site and claim ownership at any time to make changes to your description etc. Thanks and keep up the good work! Thomas Huhn

I think 12.2% of people

I think 12.2% of people using open id it's a good trend. Good job :) Janet Kellman, software reviews

Hi Very good explanation to

Hi Very good explanation to give us. I´m interesting in everything we can find out more about this issue. In addition to the page. Where can I get more information? Thanks a lot bye

Romeo y Julieta

Statistics on every web site

Statistics on every web site is of great importance. The problem can be how to make this statistics(( ------------------- Cool materials

Now Yahoo implements OpenID.

Now Yahoo implements OpenID. Yahoo's move will triple the number of OpenID accounts to 368 million. :)

Janet Kellman, software reviews manager